Hello Coach, how is my training so far. It has been 9 weeks. I feel good and getting more confident that I can finish the marathon... But from coaching perspective, what's your view?
You've got good reason to feel confident. What's on the page so far points to a finish. It doesn't yet show the part that went wrong at Kyoto and Osaka, and that test comes later in the block. Over weeks 1–9 you ran 290.2 km of the 351.5 planned (83%), your longest run is the 20.01 km you ran yesterday, and three weeks had every session done (2, 4 and 7), plus week 5 at full volume.
Read the full answer ▸Show less ▴
What's working. First, your legs are changing, and this is the most important thing in the diary. On Tuesday's 7 km at 8:10/km your cadence was 166 spm and ground contact 246 ms. On 21 October, at the same pace, it was 158 spm and 308 ms. Your feet now spend 60 ms less on the ground per step, which is the first hard evidence that the Monday gym is fixing the thing that failed in both marathons. Second, your engine has room to spare: the 5 km gate went in 31:07 at 146 bpm, which is tempo effort rather than flat out, and the 20 km went at 7:57/km in 25 °C and 93% humidity at about 135 bpm. Third, you hold your pace when it's set for you. Wednesday's threshold reps all landed within 10 s of the band, the last one fastest, and your easy days are now actually easy. Fourth, you need 7:56/km to make the 5:35 cutoff. You already run long runs at that pace in Bangkok heat, and the same effort should come out 20–35 s/km quicker in a Kyoto February.
What worries me. Consistency, not fitness. Weeks 3 and 6 dropped to about 16 km, right after your two biggest weeks, which is the same crash pattern your history shows. The repeat rule has fired three times, so the plan has lost about three weeks of progression. That is why your longest run is 20 km in week 9 when it was meant to be 24. Next, you start every long run too fast: weeks 7, 8 and 9 all went out quicker than the 8:15 I asked for. It cost nothing at 20 km. At 32 km and on race day it's how Osaka faded, with pace dropping while heart rate stayed flat. Nothing past 30 km has been tested yet, and both marathons fell apart between 30 and 35 km. Your ground contact still drifts up late in long runs (272 to 283 ms yesterday). The drift is smaller, but it's the same signature, and weeks 15, 18 and 21 (30, 32 and 32 km) are where we find out. Last, gym quality is hard to see. Week 9's gym shows 31 minutes against 55 planned with no sets logged, and that is the one session I'd never cut.
One thing in the plan I'd fix. The plan has week 10 at 45 km and week 11 at 57 km. That's a 27% jump, and it breaks your own 10% rule. I'd hold week 11 nearer 50 km and keep the 24 km long run.
My view: sub-5:00 is alive on paper but not proven, and it stays that way until the gates in weeks 13–19. Finishing under the cutoff is the realistic goal right now, and it's very achievable if two things hold. No more 16 km weeks, because the fitness is there and missed weeks are now the biggest risk. And your 30+ km long runs start at 8:15 or slower, with a gel every 40 minutes from this week on. Do those and I think you'll cross the line in Kyoto this time.